"NyayaDhara is a student-centric legal education and information portal dedicated to equipping aspiring legal professionals with essential legal skills, knowledge, and insights, making them future-ready to tackle legal challenges effectively."
"NyayaDhara is a student-centric legal education and information portal dedicated to equipping aspiring legal professionals with essential legal skills, knowledge, and insights, making them future-ready to tackle legal challenges effectively."
The role of a reviewer in the peer-review process is crucial to maintaining the quality and integrity of academic publications. As a reviewer for the Nyayadhara International Journal of Legal Research, so as a reputed journal we are strictly adhere to the following guidelines:
Reviewers assist the Editor and Editorial Board in making informed editorial decisions. Your feedback will also help authors improve their manuscript. Reviewers are encouraged to offer constructive criticism and suggestions to enhance the overall quality of the paper.
Timeliness is critical in the peer-review process. If you feel you are unable to complete the review on time or do not have the expertise to evaluate the manuscript, please notify the editor immediately and withdraw from the review process. This will allow the editor to find an alternative reviewer promptly.
Any manuscript received for review is a confidential document. You are expected to treat all information in the manuscript as private and should not share, discuss, or disclose its content with others unless authorized by the editor. Breaching confidentiality is considered a serious ethical violation.
Reviews should be objective and based solely on the quality and content of the manuscript. Personal criticisms or biases against the author(s) are unacceptable. You should provide clear, reasoned feedback, supported by evidence and examples where necessary, to guide the author in improving the manuscript.
As a reviewer, you are responsible for identifying any instances where relevant prior works or sources have been overlooked by the author. Any missing citations, particularly of influential papers or studies that are crucial to the manuscript’s arguments, should be highlighted. Additionally, if you observe any significant overlap or similarity with other published works, please notify the editor immediately.
You must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could affect your impartiality in reviewing the manuscript. This includes any personal, academic, or professional relationships with the author(s), or any competitive or collaborative ties with the paper’s subject matter. In such cases, you should recuse yourself from the review process.
Reviewers are expected to be vigilant in identifying possible instances of plagiarism, whether it is direct copying or self-plagiarism (reusing previously published work without proper citation). The journal uses advanced plagiarism detection software for manuscript screening, and any detected plagiarism will result in the immediate rejection of the manuscript.
The primary goal of your review is to provide constructive feedback that benefits the author. Your recommendations should be made in a respectful and professional tone, highlighting areas for improvement, providing suggestions for clarification or expansion, and ensuring that the manuscript meets the standards of academic research.
By adhering to these responsibilities, you contribute to ensuring the high academic standards upheld by Nyayadhara International Journal of Legal Research. Your role as a reviewer is vital in fostering scholarly discourse, advancing legal research, and maintaining the integrity of academic publishing.
